You can ask for anything.
Want to review content before it’s published? You can ask.
Want media to hold off on a story until you’re ready for the information to be released? You can ask.
Want media to stop live tweeting a police standoff? You can ask.
You can ask for anything. As I tell students, “they can’t eat you.” What’s the worst thing that can happen when you make a request? You get told “no” and life goes on.
It’s when the request becomes a rights-limiting demand that I become concerned. When prior review is demanded, information is withheld and censorship becomes accepted—that’s what makes my blood boil.
The ethics of such requests is the subject of this week’s ethics question for my media law and ethics class.
Students were asked specifically to consider a case last month where the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department asked the news media to stop tweeting about the manhunt for fugitive ex-cop Christopher Dorner.
“The sheriff has asked all members of the press to stop tweeting immediately. It is hindering officer safety. #Dorner,” tweeted the Sheriff’s Department handle, @sbcountyda.
I asked students to take a stance on the question:
“Should reporters have stopped live tweeting, as requested by the sheriff, during the Dorner manhunt?”
I’d love for you to weigh in on the issue.
Let’s Talk Nerdy!
Should reporters have stopped live tweeting during the Dorner manhunt? What should media consider when these types of requests are made?
MZazeela says
Kenna – Tough question. Grassroots media can work to the advantage as well as disadvantage. I think, in the long run, spreading more information around, more quickly, is an advantage to law enforcement. Perhaps not in every case, but likely in most cases. If they could not explain how it would hinder officers’ safety, why should it be considered credible? Perhaps they simply considered the tweeting an annoyance they wanted to get rid of?
Sadly, in today’s environment, the comments from all public figures are subject to skepticism.
profkrg says
MZazeela Media have to use common sense when live reporting in these types of situations. However, it’s unacceptable to expect them not to report live.
MZazeela says
profkrg MZazeela Kenna, you make two good points. One, they should exercise common sense judgment, but they frequently don’t in their quest for sensational headlines. Two, inhibiting live reporting is a form of censorship.
shootfor10 says
@TheChalkOutline @profkrg no
superdumb says
@Jason__Ramsey I’d love to have ridiculously thick supermodel hair someday. Just for once!
chattyprof says
I totally agree that there is never a harm in asking, because if you don’t ask, you just never know. But the ask is not a guarantee in and of itself :-). Ellen
jandis_price says
Be Open, Honest and Sincere…RT@MartinaMcGowan: You Can Ask, But Don’t Demand http://t.co/dTRhoseZ34 via @profkrg